Variations in analgesic, sedation, and delirium management between trauma and non-trauma critically ill children.

INTRODUCTION: Studies have shown the benefit of intensive care unit (ICU) bundled protocols; however, they are primarily derived from medical patients. We hypothesized that patients and their medication profiles are different between critically ill medical, surgical, and trauma patients. METHODS: The Pediatric Health Information System 2017 dataset was used to perform a retrospective cohort study of critically ill children. The pediatric medical, surgical, and trauma cohorts were separated based on ICD-10 codes. Data collected included demographics, secondary diagnoses, outcomes, and medication data. Medications were grouped as opiates, GABA-agonists, alpha-2 agonists, anti-psychotics, paralytics, and "other" sedatives. A non-parametric Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (KS test) and odds ratios (reference group: medical cohort) were calculated to compare medication administration between the study cohorts for the first 30 ICU days. RESULTS: A total of 4488 critically ill children (medical 2078, surgical 1650, and trauma 760) were identified. The trauma cohort had increased incidence of delirium (medical 10.8%, surgical 11.5%, trauma 13.8%; p < 0.01) and mortality (medical 5.4%, surgical 2.4%, trauma 11.7%; p < 0.01). For all study cohorts, > 50% received GABA-agonists on ICU days 0-30. With the KS test, there was a significant difference in administration of opiates, GABA-agonists, alpha-2 agonists, anti-psychotics, and "other" sedatives over the first 30 days in the ICU. Relative to medical patients, trauma patients had significantly higher odds of receiving anti-psychotics on ICU days 10-20 and 22-24. CONCLUSION: Critically ill pediatric trauma, medical, and surgical patients are distinctly different patient populations with differing pharmacologic profiles for analgesia, sedation, and delirium. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (Retrospective Comparative Study).

Comprehensive Improvement of Cardiology Inpatient Transfers: A Bed-availability Triggered Approach.

Introduction: Patient transfers pose a potential risk during hospitalizations. Structured communication practices are necessary to ensure effective handoffs, but occur amidst competing priorities and constraints. We sought to design and implement a multidisciplinary process to enhance communication between pediatric cardiovascular intensive care unit and cardiology floor teams with a comprehensive approach evaluating efficiency, safety, and culture. Methods: We conducted a prospective quality improvement study to enact a bed-availability triggered bedside handoff process. The primary aim was to reduce the time between handoff and unit transfer. Secondary metrics captured the impact on safety (reported safety events, overnight transfers, bounce backs, and I-PASS utilization), efficiency (transfer latency, unnecessary patient handoffs, and cumulative time providers were engaged in handoffs), and culture (team members perceptions of satisfaction, collaboration, and handoff efficiency via survey data). Results: Eighty-two preimplementation surveys, 26 stakeholder interviews, and 95 transfers were completed during the preintervention period. During the postintervention period, 145 handoffs were audited. We observed significant reductions in transfer latency, unnecessary handoffs, and cumulative provider handoff time. Overnight transfers decreased, and no negative impact was observed in reported safety events or bouncebacks. Survey results showed a positive impact on collaboration, efficiency, and satisfaction among team members. Conclusions: Developing safer handoff practices require a collaborative, structured, and stepwise approach. Advances are attainable in high-volume centers, and comprehensive measurement of change is necessary to ensure a positive impact on the overall patient and provider environment.